CPF-linked funds post 6.6% loss in Q2: Lipper
Posted by: admin in General, Unit Trust on August 26th, 2010
Performance mainly dragged down by losses of global equities-linked funds
By JAMIE LEE
(SINGAPORE) Funds registered under the Central Provident Fund investment scheme (CPFIS) suffered an overall loss in the second quarter of this year, reversing from slight gains in Q1, as uncertainty over the eurozone debt crisis and the US economy took hold.
The overall performance of the 334 funds - 156 unit trusts and 178 investment-linked insurance products - licensed to tap CPF savings fell 6.55 per cent on average in the three months ended June, data from fund research firm Lipper shows.
Their performance was mainly dragged down by losses sustained by funds linked to global equities.
By comparison, in Q1 the funds posted a marginal overall gain of 1.53 per cent, with unit trusts gaining 1.9 per cent on average and investment-linked insurance products (ILPs) gaining 1.19 per cent on average.
But unit trusts posted an average loss of 7.27 per cent in Q2. Of these mutual funds, those linked to equities posted the biggest loss, higher than those linked to mixed assets - a mix of equities and fixed-income securities - and bonds.
Equity-linked trusts lost 8.63 per cent on average, while mixed-asset funds were down 5.09 per cent on average.
Funds linked to bonds posted a modest overall gain of 0.9 per cent.
Despite the poor showing by equity-linked unit trusts overall, CPFIS mutual funds linked to equities in Thailand, Malaysia and India took the first three spots among the top-performing asset classes in the first half of the year.
Unit trusts linked to Thailand shrugged off the political crisis there in May to post a 9.63 per cent return.
Insurance-linked products (ILPs) lost 5.89 per cent broadly in Q2. Those linked to equities posted an average loss of 8.23 per cent, while those exposed to mixed assets had a negative average return of 4.2 per cent.
ILPs linked to bonds fared best, gaining 1.42 per cent in Q2, while those linked to the money market - which refers to fixed-income markets with an average residual life to maturity of under a year - returned just 0.08 per cent.
For the first half of 2010, CPFIS funds linked to bonds were the clear winners, posting an average gain of about 2 per cent.
Funds tied to the money market followed with an overall gain of less than one per cent.
In the six months ended June, equity-linked funds posted a loss of about 8 per cent, while mixed asset-linked funds saw a negative return of about 6 per cent in the same period.
Some 3,000 Singapore-based funds posted a 6 per cent drop in total net assets in the first half, taking the fund size tally to just over $4 billion, data from Lipper for Investment Management shows.
Source: Business Times
IncomeShield - Fastest Claims Return Rate
IncomeShield - Fastest Claims Return Rate
We are pleased to share with you that based on MOH statistics (1 October 2009 - 31 December 2009), IncomeShield has the fastest Claims Return Rate amongst the other MediSave Approved Shield providers.
This means best service in the health insurance industry for your clients when they need us most.
How do you read the chart ? https://www.moh.gov.sg/mohcorp/hcfinancing.aspx?id=342
a. Claims return rate indicates how long it takes each insurer to process claims with positive payouts.
b. Cumulative claims return rate, refers to the percentage of claims processed by the insurer within one week, two weeks and one month. The higher the percentage the better.
c. The fifth column shows the median number of days it takes each insurer to process claims. The lower the number of days the better.
|
Cumulative Claims Return Rate |
Median claims return rate (days) |
|||
|
<= 1 week |
<= 2 weeks |
<= 4 weeks |
||
|
AIA |
64% |
78% |
86% |
5 |
|
AVIVA |
80% |
85% |
91% |
2 |
|
Great Eastern |
92% |
94% |
96% |
1 |
|
NTUC Income |
92% |
94% |
97% |
1 |
|
Prudential |
85% |
91% |
94% |
2 |
(1 October 2009 - 31 December 2009)
Note(1) : The number of days insurers take to process claims includes the time it takes to obtain medical records from claimants or medical institutions.
The above statistics can be found under MOH website at https://www.moh.gov.sg/mohcorp/hcfinancing.aspx?id=342
The choice is yours: CPF
Posted by: admin in General, Insurance, Unit Trust on March 29th, 2010
SINGAPORE : Should the CPF Investment Scheme be stopped so that members will not risk losing their retirement nest egg?
Yes, thinks a resident who claimed that he had lost some $350,000 in his CPF account after investing in shares under CPFIS.
The Lengkong Tiga resident, who identified himself as Mr Goh, said during the ministerial dialogue on Sunday that he only got back $35,000 eventually but did not say if these were the gains from the investments or the amount he could withdraw from his Ordinary Account (OA) on top of the Minimum Sum.
He also did not say how he lost the sum and whether the investments spanned a few years.
MediaCorp understands that members can only invest up to 35 per cent of their money in their OA in shares.
Mr Goh said he had suggested to the CPF Board to stop allowing members to invest in shares but staff had replied that it was his personal choice to make the investments.
Second Minister for Finance Lim Hwee Hua said she agreed with the CPF Board’s stance, adding that there had been “a lot of demand” for the Government to allow members to invest their CPF money before the CPFIS was introduced.
She quipped: “I’ll convey your feedback to the CPF Board but I’m not quite sure the rest will agree that we should stop the scheme.”
The latest performance numbers of funds under the CPFIS released earlier this month pointed to a solid year.
According to Lipper, the funds tracking company under the CPF Board’s guidelines, the average return of CPFIS—included funds, unit trusts and investment—linked insurance products (ILPs) rose 38.62 per cent last year compared with the same period a year ago. — TODAY
HDB new set of rules in short..
Posted by: admin in General, Real Estate on March 8th, 2010
These 2 months we will see a lot of new rules implementing to reduce excessive speculation and exuberance in the property scene.
In a nutshell the changes are:
- HDB allow buyers to take a 2nd concessionary loan from HDB even if they downsize to a smaller flat or move to a flat of the same size. Previously, only upgraders qualified for a second concessionary loan. However the sales proceeds from the sale of a flat, seller can only keep the greater of $25,000 or half of the cash proceeds. The remaining cash and CPF balance has to be used to finance the purchase of the next flat if they take up a HDB concessionary loan.
- MOP increased to three years for all flats bought in the resale market. Currently, the MOP is 2.5 years for buyers who choose to take up an HDB concessionary loan and just 1 year for buyers who either take a commercial bank loan or do not take any loan.
- 3,800 more elderly lessees will now benefit from its lease buyback scheme which has been revised. The scheme allows the elderly to monetise their flats by selling the tail end of the flat’s lease back to HDB.
- HDB will withhold $10,000 of the subsidies for a household made up of 1 Singapore Citizen + 1 PR when they buy a HDB flat. Once the PR converts to citizenship, or when the couple has a Singapore citizen child, the Board will return the withheld subsidy.
- A quota cap for PR households of 8 per cent in each block and 5 per cent within each neighbourhood.
- It will be applied on top of the ethnic integration policy (EIP) but will not apply to Malaysian PRs.
- EIP for Indian/Others limit was raised from 10 per cent and 13 per cent at the neighbourhood and block levels to 12 per cent and 15 per cent respectively.
New HDB rule to protect new flat owners
Posted by: admin in Real Estate on January 14th, 2010
From 1 Feb this year, flat owners who sublet rooms in their HDB flats will have to register with HDB within 7 days of doing so.
For tenancies beginning before 1 Feb, owners have a six-month grace period from that date to register.
Owners also have to inform HDB when they renew or terminate the subletting of rooms and when there are changes to tenants’ particulars.
There is no need to seek prior approval for the subletting of rooms.
HDB announced this yesterday in support of the efforts of the Ministry of Home Affairs to stamp out loan shark activities.
It hopes the move will help to address the problem of new flat occupiers being harassed by loan sharks while the borrowers are untraceable.
The additional information will enable MHA to trace such borrowers.
Flat owners can register their sub-letting of rooms online or at HDB branch offices.
A maximum penalty of $3,000 will be imposed for non-compliance.
Flat owners who repeatedly fail to comply with the new regulation may have their flat acquired by HDB.
Source: TNP 13th January 2010
CPF warns: Stiff fines for rebate scams
Posted by: admin in General, Unit Trust on January 2nd, 2010
By Lorna Tan, Senior Correspondent
CENTRAL Provident Fund members have been warned they face fines of up to $10,000 if they take part in a scam that has just come to light.
The CPF Board issued the stern warning after a report in The Straits Times yesterday exposing a practice adopted by unscrupulous financial advisers who plunder members’ CPF investment funds.
Some CPF members who are desperate for fast cash have agreed to take part in the scam, which involves the rapid buying and selling - or ‘churning’ - of investment products using CPF money.
The members dip into their retirement savings to buy and sell investment products under the CPF Investment Scheme - and in doing so they become eligible for cash rebates used as a carrot by errant financial advisers.
The advisers get to pocket healthy commissions.
CPF rules prohibit members from pocketing such cash rebates. All gains or rebates from CPF investments must be put back into members’ CPF accounts, to ensure they have enough for their golden years.
A CPF Board spokesman said: ‘CPF members found guilty of working with errant financial advisers to pocket cash rebates which amount to premature withdrawals of CPF monies may be fined up to $2,500. For second or subsequent convictions, the fine may be up to $10,000.’
The scam typically involves frequent buying and selling of unit trusts and investment-linked insurance policies for no good reason. In the process, the customer gets hit with charges while the financial adviser pockets extra commissions. Over an extended period of churning activity, the customer suffers as the savings in his CPF account - used for the transactions - inevitably dwindle, particularly in a falling or flat market.
Advisers typically entice CPF members to ‘churn’ by investing their retirement funds in return for monthly cash rebates. In most cases, CPF members are given blank forms to sign, authorising the advisers to transact these products on their behalf.
The cash rebates come from the sales charges tied to each transaction. The sales charge works out to 2 per cent to 3 per cent of the sum invested, of which the customer receives a cut. The balance is pocketed by the adviser, a person who may have introduced the member to the adviser, and the investment firm.
Singapore Insurance Institute council member, Mr Stanley Jeremiah, urged CPF members to be more careful about safeguarding their retirement funds.
‘People should be aware that by participating in churning they are cheating themselves because they are dissipating their retirement funds and committing a criminal offence,’ he said.
Mr Jeremiah said that even if a CPF member wants to take a chance, he would be making a big mistake because if he is caught, the penalties would be bigger than most of the cash rebates. With continued churning, the fines can be very substantial.
This article was first published in The Straits Times.
Source: AsiaOne Business
Unit Trust fees SLASHED!
Posted by: admin in Unit Trust on January 2nd, 2010
DBS, Fundsupermart among those which now charge just 1%
A PRICE war seems to have broken out in the unit trust industry in Singapore, with at least three fund distributors now slashing their sales charges to just 1 per cent.
DBS Bank started the ball rolling in early October when it cut its sales charge on all unit trusts to 1 per cent - a move the bank says has already resulted in a two-fold increase in unit trust sales.
Last Tuesday, online fund distributor Fundsupermart.com reduced its sales charge for its 11 best performing funds over a period of three years to 1 per cent.
And The Straits Times has learnt that even though it has not advertised this, Standard Chartered Bank (Stanchart) is also offering a 1 per cent sales charge to selected customers quietly.
Unit trusts are typically sold by banks, insurers, stockbrokers and other independent financial advisers.
These distributors levy an upfront sales charge, which is deducted straightaway from the principal amount an investor puts into a unit trust.
Read the full story in Saturday’s edition of The Straits Times @ Dec 19, 2009
By Sylvia Paik
Yes, insurance companies DO pay for insurance claims
Posted by: admin in Uncategorized on October 15th, 2009
There are probably many claims that are rejected in the course of these. So to avoid disappointment, off the top of my head, here’s what you should keep in mind:
- Read contract: what’s covered, what’s not, is there any minimum bill need to be charged before claim is valid, and some finer details.
- Most importantly, declare as much as you can any health issues when applying for insurance. Insurance payout may be voided if there are discrepancies. Then all of those premiums you’ve been paying will go down the drain.
Manulife Q1 Claims statistics
Download here.
Made a loss in your investment? Here’s why you should invest more
Posted by: admin in Uncategorized on August 5th, 2009
Ali invested $100,000 in 2007. As he finally decides to see how’s his investment is doing, he realizes that he lost $40,000 in the unit trust DWS China Equity fund and now he is left with $60,000. After consulting his adviser, the adviser realizes that Ali still have $50,000 investible amount in his bank reserves and suggested Ali to top-up his current investment. “Why should I put in more money into this investment when it made me lose money?”, Ali questioned. The adviser did the math for him:
In order to recover his $40,000, DWS China Equity Fund has to yield 67% to bring up his $60,000 balance to $100,000.
If Ali adds $50,000 to his investment, his new balance will $110,000. His total invested amount is now $150,000. Still $40,000 short, but mathematics later reveal that DWS China Equity Fund has only need to yield 37% to gain his $40,000!
Would it be easier to yield 67% or 37%? The answer is obvious. What if instead of adding $50,000, he adds $100,000 to his current balance instead?
The DWS China Equity fund would only need to yield 25%! Ali would get back his $40,000 much faster than before!
Fools rush in, or the early birds catches the worm?
Posted by: admin in General, Unit Trust on May 12th, 2009
To quote an article by IFast in Fundsupermart.com,
“However, we have recently seen a change in sentiment and increasing investor risk appetite, and this has benefited most equity funds and even higher-risk fixed income funds.”
There’s certainly a hint of optimism among the investors out there. Being a forward looking individual like myself, the storm will eventually subside as they always do. Unless you’re talking about the end of the world that is..